Finished Intelligence Report Template
Purpose
Structure a CTI report that supports decisions rather than only summarizing research.
Fields
- title: Report title.
- audience: Consumer and decision owner.
- executive_summary: Concise decision-focused summary.
- key_judgments: Evidence-backed judgments with confidence.
- evidence: Source and evidence references.
- assessment: Analytic interpretation.
- implications: Defensive, operational, or business impact.
- recommendations: Specific actions.
- gaps: Known unknowns.
- appendix: Source and technical detail.
Example Values
title: CTI Assessment of RMM Abuse Reporting
audience: SOC Lead and Detection Engineering
executive_summary: Public reporting supports a hunt, not production alerting yet.
key_judgments: Medium-confidence relevance due to current RMM exposure.
recommendations: Run 30-day hunt and baseline admin tooling.
gaps: Unknown local false-positive volume.
Quality Gates
- Audience and decision are clear.
- Key judgments include confidence.
- Recommendations are actionable.
- Gaps are visible.
Common Failure Modes
- Research dump.
- No decision supported.
- No confidence language.
Practical Workflow
- Create the artifact only after the intelligence requirement or decision is clear.
- Fill required fields before writing narrative prose.
- Attach evidence labels, source references, confidence, and limitations.
- Review with the intended consumer.
- Update the artifact when evidence, telemetry, or decision context changes.
Analyst Checklist
- Is the consumer defined?
- Are required fields complete?
- Are claims source-backed or marked Gap?
- Is confidence justified?
- Are limitations explicit?
- Is there a next action or owner?
Cross-Links
References
Required vs Optional Fields
Required: audience, decision, key judgments, evidence references, confidence, implications, recommendations, gaps, limitations.
Optional: technical appendix, source register extract, detection backlog links.
Pass / Fail Example
Pass: Key judgments are evidence-backed and recommendations are owned.
Fail: Report summarizes articles but does not support a decision.
Complete Filled Example
title: Assessment of RMM Abuse Relevance to Corporate Endpoint Estate
audience: SOC Lead and Detection Engineering
decision: Approve scoped 30-day hunt or defer.
key_judgment: Medium-confidence relevance due to public reporting and local RMM exposure.
evidence: EV-RMM-001, SRC-RMM-001
recommendation: Run DRL-4 hunt; do not deploy production alert yet.
gaps: No benign baseline or historical replay.
limitations: No evidence of compromise in this environment.